Drugs, Diseases & Vaccines

Thursday, November 10, 2005

More Shady Dealings in the FDA


The FDA has decided to back down from a recent plan that would have required long-term studies of new psychiatric drugs before allowing them on the market.

The reversal came after a panel of experts unanimously recommended against requiring such studies. The panel's vote came in the wake of complaints from industry executives, academic researchers, and patient advocates.

Studies of Eight Weeks or Less

The new plan would have called for companies to conduct studies for as long as six months before seeking approval. Currently, psychiatric drugs are generally approved after only two short-term studies, which may last only eight weeks. This is the case for many forms of medication.

Physicians, however, usually prescribe psychiatric drugs for much longer periods. Regulators in the European Union and other countries require longer-term data.

Life-Saving Information Suppressed

Meanwhile, The Independent, a British newspaper, reports that vital information about prescription medications has been suppressed by the FDA. Even if the information can save lives, the FDA, under pressure from the pharmaceutical industry, routinely conceals information that could affect the commercial value of the drugs, rendering physicians unable to assess the real risks.

Where to Go for News?

Mike Adams, NewsTarget's Health Ranger, in his editorial on this information, discusses the many problems with the FDA, and also the disturbing implications of the fact that this report did not appear in a domestic media outlet. It is, he points out, difficult to find an outlet, other than sites such as Mercola.com or NewsTarget itself, that accept no advertising from drug companies. The inevitable result is that news that is not acceptable to the advertisers is soft-pedaled or ignored, lest they pull funding.

Washington Post October 26, 2005
NewsTarget.com October 14, 2005

Once again, the FDA reveals that it is only beholden to its true constituents -- drug company executives.

However, you might have been surprised to note that the safety testing wasn't just protested by industry executives, but also by academic researchers and patient advocates. Why would this be? Why would patient advocates argue in favor of only eight-week trials on drugs that patients may take for months or years?

It might be interesting to find out who those 'patient advocates' actually were. The FDA has a long history of using 'experts' who are little more than industry shills.

Federal law prevents the FDA from hiring experts with any potential conflicts of interest. However, between 1998 and 2000, the FDA waived this restriction more than 800 times. It has been estimated that over half of all the members of their advisory panels have financial ties to the pharmaceutical companies that stand to gain or lose from their decision.

The New York Times investigated possible conflicts of interest in the controversial 2005 panel that allowed the deadly COX-2 painkillers to remain on the market (Vioxx, Celebrex, Bextra). They found that one-third of the panel had ties to the very drug company they were seeking to regulate. If the votes of these individuals were removed, then the COX-2 inhibitors would not have been allowed to return to the market. The FDA has yet to overturn their decision.


FDA senior associate commissioner Linda Suydam, who is responsible for waiving conflict of interest restrictions, states that often the best experts to hire are the same experts that consult the industry. Unfortunately, this does not explain how "consumer representatives" on advisory panels often also have financial ties to the industry.

When it comes to consumer protection, the FDA is no great savior. When it comes to protecting the interests of businesses, however, the FDA will cheat, lie, ignore its own guidelines, and do whatever it takes to get the job done.

News like this merely reinforces just
how broken this conventional health care model truly is, and why more people are taking better responsibility for their health by seeking alternative methods that treat their conditions more safely.

If for some reason this statement surprises you, I encourage you to review the
interview with, Dr. David Graham, an FDA insider who helped expose the Vioxx scandal to Congress. He reveals many of the secrets going on in the FDA in this amazing interview.


Related Articles:

Vioxx Reapproved by FDA Panel Members With Ties to Drug Companies

FDA Screws Up Again

FDA's New Fast Drug Approvals Endanger Your Health

Wednesday, October 19, 2005

The Needle-less Flu Shot - Homeopathics

In the devastating 1918 flu pandemic, which claimed more lives than World War I, only 1.05% of those who used homeopathic remedies perished... in contrast to a 28.2% death rate in those who used conventional treatment.

With flu season at hand once again, many people are lining up for their flu shots -- in spite of the controversy that surrounds it (for more about vaccines, see Daily Health News,
February, 9, 2004).

While many readers were up in arms after my earlier article about the benefits of homeopathy (Daily Health News, July 25, 2005) the above statistics are enough for me to think it's worth investigating. I asked homeopathic expert Michael Carlston, MD, author of Classical Homeopathy (Churchill Livinstone), once again, for his recommendation on beating the flu this fall.

HOMEOPATHIC STRATEGY FOR THE FLU

Like all homeopathic treatments, flu-fighting strategies encourage the body to marshal its own healing resources to fight off the flu rather than simply suppress symptoms. And because they are so highly diluted, homeopathic preparations are not associated with the adverse effects of conventional medicines. Interestingly, one of the homeopathic treatments available today is actually based on the original samples of the 1918 serum, which was itself derived from a blood component taken from an infected person in 1918.

Homeopathic treatments are not flu-strain specific, as flu shots are. Rather, as with all homeopathic treatments, different ones work for different symptoms. Specific flu symptoms and characteristics will help determine the homeopathic medicine that is best for you, we hear from Dr. Carlston. Options include:


Gelsemium
Gelsemium was the primary homeopathic medicine used with great success during the 1918 flu pandemic. Dr. Carlston recommends gelsemium for flu sufferers who have extreme lethargy, fatigue and shakiness. Flu symptoms appropriate for treatment with gelsemium include :Dizziness and weakness, dullness, exhaustion, sleepiness and heaviness, Symptoms that grow worse with movement, Headache at the back of the head, Muscular soreness in the neck and shoulders, Stiff neck, Chills, including down the spine, Alternating sensations of hot and cold.

Bryonia
Bryonia is best for flu sufferers who are irritable and worried and, Greta Garbo-like, "just want to be alone." In contrast, flu sufferers who are better off with gelsemium do not have the energy to be this emotional. Symptoms that call for treatment with bryonia include: Dullness that is accompanied by irritability and worry, Headache in the forehead that feels better with pressure and worse with motion, An uncomfortable feeling of warmth with a strong desire for cool air, Extreme thirst for warm drinks.

Eupatorium perfoliatum
Eupatorium perfoliatum is for influenza accompanied by deep bone pain. It may feel as if your bones are actually broken, says Dr. Carlston. This pain is most pronounced just before and after chills. Eupatorium perfoliatum is most appropriate for a bout of influenza characterized by the following symptoms: Soreness and aching of the entire body, especially in the bones, Hoarseness and sore throat, A severe cough that hurts the head and chest, Thirst, Runny nose, inflammation and stinging tears, Bad digestion, stomach pains, constipation and excessive gas that may lead to vomiting.

Oscillococcinum
Oscillococcinum, in contrast to the other homeopathic medicines discussed here, is a more general flu remedy. One of the most widely used homeopathic medicines in the world, it is formulated from the liver and heart of the Barbary duck. Like humans, birds are susceptible to a variety of flu viruses, which in some cases may be transmitted to humans. This medicine was created by a French physician in 1925 in response to the disastrous 1918 pandemic. In recent years, it has resulted in milder symptoms and a shorter duration of the flu in two double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in Europe.

What About Prevention?

Of course, most of us hope to avoid coming down with the flu in the first place. The classic homeopathic medicine to stave off the flu is Influenzinum, made each year by the French firm Dolisos from flu virus strains recommended by the World Health Organization. The usual dosage is one vial of liquid a week (swish the liquid in your mouth briefly and then swallow) for four weeks beginning in October, followed by a fifth vial three weeks later.

Homeopathic prevention has certain advantages over the influenza vaccine...

  • Flu shots carry a small but real risk of life-threatening Guillain-Barre syndrome (a devastating viral disorder involving the spinal cord and nerves).
  • Flu shots are likely to contain the mercury-derived preservative thimerosol. (Learn more about the dangers of mercury in Daily Health News, September 6, 2005.)

Dr. Carlston adds that the best way to stay well and prevent disease of all kinds lies in consistent dietary and lifestyle decisions to improve long-term health and immunity. This is better than relying on a single pill or shot to prevent any particular ailment.


How to Use Homeopathic Medicine

According to Dr. Carlston, in this country, three out of four people who use homeopathic remedies treat themselves. If you are self-treating, carefully follow instructions on the label for administration and dosage.

Homeopathic medicines come as small pills or drops to be taken under the tongue. Do not touch the medicine, because contact with dirt or oil on the skin can potentially inactivate it. Use a spoon.

If you are taking a homeopathic medicine to treat the flu (as opposed to preventing it), stop taking it once you see an improvement in symptoms.

If you are seeking preventive care, Dr. Carlston says that professional homeopathic treatment is more effective than self-treatment.

To find a homeopathic practitioner in your area, visit the Web site of the National Center for Homeopathy at http://dailyhealthnews.ed10.net/h/D6S2/L714/50/OJFJTS

or the American Institute of Homeopathy at http://dailyhealthnews.ed10.net/h/D6SM/L714/50/OJFJTS.

You also can consult the site of the

American Association of Naturopathic Physicians at http://dailyhealthnews.ed10.net/h/2N4A/L714/50/OJFJTS

because naturopathic physicians are trained in homeopathy.

As always, remember that the key to wellness is in your own hands. Keeping fit and healthy the whole year round will give you the best odds to making it through another flu season without getting sick.

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Thimerosal - Safe When Injected, But Hold Your Breath and Don’t Swallow!

Anyone who has paid any attention to the great vaccine debate over the last couple of years will have heard of Thimerosal. It’s a chemical that has historically been added to vaccines as a preservative. There’s been debate about whether this mercury derivative has been in any way responsible for the huge increases in childhood autism over the last decade.

Of course, vaccine-makers have claimed that their products are, and have always been, safe. Most have, however, publicly said that they no longer use Thimerosal in their vaccines. Not because it is unsafe, but simply because the public asked for it. (yeah, right!)

In any event, here’s an interesting bit of info from the Merck website. Thimerosal is classified as VERY TOXIC, and even has the wicked skull and cross bones symbol in red, no less! Here’s how they define “very toxic”: Inhalation, swallowing, or absorption through the skin in very small amounts can cause considerable damage to health, and may sometimes be lethal. There is serious evidence of severe, possibly irreversible, damage to health by single, repeated, or prolonged absorption. How can it be toxic if absorbed through the skin unto the bloodstream, but safe when injected directly into the body? So be warned: Don’t breathe it. Don’t drink it. Don’t let it get on your skin. But, it’s okay to inject it into the bloodstream of infants, over and over and over and over again…. yeah, sure.

Read a great article about mercury poisoning in the March 2005 issue of Discover Magazine.

Vaccine Information And Vaccination Hazards

Vaccines.... Preventing Disease or Wreaking Havoc in a Body?

Click here for a Vaccination Discussion Forum.

While there is more information on the pros and cons of vaccines than I could ever pour through to determine it's relavence for this blog, or it's factual content even; I am not here to preach for or against vaccinations. I am here to help you find leads to inform yourself and weigh your own risks.

Here is an article by a journalist in search of Amish children with Autism (since they don't vaccinate). Her results are predictable.

Personally, I don't see how injecting our children with chemicals, which we have determined to be toxic in other instances, are considered 'safe' for this usage. Ethyl Mercury, formaldahyde, etc.

Picture an infant, newly exposed to... well, to everything. And everyone. Their tiny bodies, sometimes fragile, trying to adjust to 'life' and building immunity to everyday exposures, germs, and even the toxins we live with and don't consider; such as perfume, laundry detergent, dryer sheets, allergens, new foods or formulas, air pollutants, etc. Now add a tri-fold vaccine like or DPaT, which they never receive alone, so add the Polio and HIb. Now you have 5...that's FIVE diseases injected in one office visit, our children are fighting. But not just the diseases, also each vaccines preservative of choice. Formaldahyde, mercury, other un-pronouncable chemicals the body has to strain out and eliminate. And that's in a healthy baby with no obvious complications. I just don't get it.

Some 26 vaccinations are recommended for children before age 2, and while doctors keep telling us they are safe, more parents (and doctors) are fighting for the right to decline vaccinations and still enter children in school, day care centers and summer camps.

Look up acrodynia, a condition written about in the early 1900s that sounds exactly like autism and was shown to be caused by teething powder containing mercury. The disease disappeared when the teething powder was taken off the market.

What parent believes it's an acceptable risk that his or her 2-year-old could be brain damaged by a DPT (diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus) shot? As our fear of these diseases recedes, what we fear more are the pharmaceuticals themselves. Too much big money is behind vaccination to get the truth from the government or the manufacturers! Too many scientists say vaccinations don't work. The diseases being vaccinated against are cured by a healthy immune system, while vaccinations debilitate the immune system. These are just a few of the obvious reasons NOT to get a vaccination without FIRST informing yourself of the way vaccines work and what is in them.

See Also:
Why My Child Won't Be Getting The MMR

Parents Don't Know Who To Trust On Vaccinations

Legally Avoiding Vaccines In The USA

The Other Side of Vaccines

The Other Side of Vaccines
By Ingrid Maida
Exclusive to Eastern Group Publications

Heralded as one of the 20th Century’s greatest medical achievements, child vaccinations have today become society’s indispensable weapon in the fight against contagious diseases. So heavily promoted are vaccine’s benefits, rarely do people doubt their effectiveness, or bother to inform themselves of their potential risks.Yet risks do exist.

Richie was born in New York in 1983 and, as is the custom, was injected with the DPT (Diphtheria, Pertussis and Tetanus) vaccination when he turned two-months-old. Thirty-three hours later, Richie, whom up until then was a healthy baby boy, had died. The death certificate stated that the cause of his passing was “irreversible shock due to a probable reaction to DPT vaccination."

Although some would believe that his case is a unique exception, the facts say otherwise.“Because vaccination is a medical procedure that carries a risk of injury or death, every citizen should have the right to be fully and accurately informed about a vaccine's benefits and risks,” said Barbara Fisher, founder and director of the National Vaccination Information Center, NVIC, based in Virginia. “Everyone should be allowed to make an informed, voluntary decision without being harassed or punished by the State.”

However, the administering of immunizations to children is not something that most parents have the power to decide. Just after birth, for example, every baby is immunized against Hepatitis B, well before a mother can inform herself about the vaccine. Requiring children be given a long list of immunizations before they can attend school is now a routine fact of life.

“Whenever the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends a new childhood vaccine for ‘universal use’, state health officials add it to the mandatory vaccination list for school requirements,” states Fisher.

While kept mostly out of mainstream view, an organized anti-vaccination movement has existed worldwide for several decades. Those who are at the forefront of this movement are not only thousands of parents of children who have been afflicted or even died from adverse reactions to immunizations, but also a growing number of doctors who seriously question the benefits vs. risks of child immunizations.

In 1996, after many years of lobbying, the Food and Drug Administration, FDA, substituted the DTP vaccine with the modified “acelluar” DtaP. According to Fisher, the old DTP vaccine, which is still used to today in Latin America, showed that 1 in every 875 people injected with it suffered convulsions, fainting spells or shocks; 1 in every 110,000 suffered cerebral inflammation; and 1 in every 310,000 suffered permanent brain damage.Until the FDA ordered the removal of DTP in 1996 after considering it too dangerous, it was administered for years and seen as a reliable vaccine by most government authorities, medical professionals and parents.

“We have been questioning one-size-fits-all national vaccine policies and calling for better quality scientific research into why so many children are becoming autistic, learning disabled, hyperactive, asthmatic and diabetic and suffering other kinds of brain and immune system problems after repeated vaccinations,” stated Fisher.

Even as some diseases like polio have almost disappeared from the face of the earth, due to massive vaccinations according to most health officials, other afflictions have spread with greater force, generating diverse investigations into the possible role vaccinations have played in their expansion.One of the most common allegations is that the MMR (Mumps, Measles and Rubella ) vaccination is somehow responsible for the dramatic rise in autism in American children.

According to a study performed by Dr. Mary Megson, autism was diagnosed in 1 out of every 10,000 children in 1978. But in 2000 it had become an “epidemic” that affected 1 in every 500 children in the U.S.

In London, Prime Minister Tony Blair fanned the flames of this controversy when in February of last year he refused to respond to questions asking whether his son had already been administered the MMR vaccine.

Due to innumerable cases of children having had some kind of adverse reaction to one or several vaccines, in 1986 the U.S. government created the National Compensation Program. Since 1988, this fund has handed out more than $558 million to 638 victims (affected adversely by vaccines) and/or their family members.

In 2002, the World Health Organization, WHO, reported 24,199 cases of adverse reactions to vaccinations in the U.S. In that same year, WHO announced only 8,296 cases of pertussis, 37 cases of measles, 27 cases of tetanus, one case of diphtheria and zero cases of polio in the U.S.

Health authorities today continue to push mandatory and voluntary vaccinations on the public, while always adding new vaccines to the already long list (like the flu vaccines). They also continue to stress that none of these have serious side effects. At the same time, those who oppose this health policy insist that not only are there too few investigations being performed on the possible negative effects of vaccines, but also that there is too much unknown about their long term effects.

“The outstanding scientific question that is yet to be answered, however, is whether the use of many vaccines in early childhood is contributing to chronic disease later in life,” said Fisher. “The use of multiple vaccines (38 doses of 12 vaccines currently) in early childhood is a relatively new development over the last 20 years.”

Friday, October 07, 2005

Our Preferred Poison


A little mercury is all that humans need to do away with themselves quietly, slowly, and surely.

By Karen Wright
Illustration by Don Foley
DISCOVER Magazine Vol. 26 No. 03
March 2005 Biology & Medicine





Let’s start with a straightforward fact:
Mercury is unimaginably toxic and dangerous.
A single drop on a human hand can be irreversibly fatal.
A single drop in a large lake can make all
the fish in it unsafe to eat.


Often referred to as quicksilver, mercury is the only common metal that is liquid at room temperature. Alchemists, including the young Sir Isaac Newton, believed it was the source of gold. In the modern era, it became a common ingredient of paints, diuretics, pesticides, batteries, fluorescent lightbulbs, skin creams, antifungal agents, vaccines for children, and of course, thermometers. There is probably some in your mouth right now: So-called silver dental fillings are one half mercury.

Mercury is also a by-product of many industrial processes. In the United States coal-fired power plants alone pump about 50 tons of it into the air each year. That mercury rains out of the sky into oceans, lakes, rivers, and streams, where it becomes concentrated in the flesh of fish, shellfish, seals, and whales. Last year the Food and Drug Administration determined there is so much mercury in the sea that women of childbearing age should severely limit their consumption of larger ocean fish. The warning comes too late for many mothers. A nationwide survey by the Centers for Disease Control shows that one in 12 women of childbearing age already have unsafe blood levels of mercury and that as many as 600,000 babies in the United States could be at risk. But that begs a critical question: At risk for what?

Photograph by James Wojcik


TUNA TYPES

One particularly common source of low-level mercury exposure is tuna. Because they are large, long-lived predators, tuna accumulate more mercury in their tissue than smaller, short-lived fish. When tested for mercury in parts per million, flesh from albacore tuna, which take five years to mature, was shown to contain about four times as much mercury as chunk light tuna, which is harvested from younger fish. Infants born to mothers contaminated by mercury in Japan’s Minamata Bay in 1956 had profound neurological disabilities including deafness, blindness, mental retardation, and cerebral palsy. In adults, mercury poisoning can cause numbness, stumbling, dementia, and death. “It’s no secret that mercury exposure is highly toxic,” says toxicologist Alan Stern, a contributor to a 2000 National Research Council report on mercury toxicity. But high-level exposures like those at Minamata cannot help scientists determine whether six silver fillings and a weekly tuna-salad sandwich will poison you or an unborn child. “The question is, what are the effects at low levels of exposure?” he says.

Data now suggest effects might occur at levels lower than anyone suspected. Some studies show that children who were exposed to tiny amounts of mercury in utero have slower reflexes, language deficits, and shortened attention spans. In adults, recent studies show a possible link between heart disease and mercury ingested from eating fish. Other groups claim mercury exposure is responsible for Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, and the escalating rate of autism.

How—and in what form—mercury inflicts damage is still unclear. Yet scientists and policymakers agree that more regulation is imperative. The Environmental Protection Agency plans to finalize its controversial first rule on reducing mercury emissions from power plants this month, and delegates from the United Nations Environment Programme met in late February to discuss an international convention limiting mercury use and emissions.

A decade ago researchers and lawmakers agreed that lead, another heavy metal, was harmful to children at levels one-sixth as high as previously recognized. But it took scientists decades to establish the scope and subtlety of lead poisoning. Mercury is now a ubiquitous contaminant. The average American may have several micrograms of it in each liter of blood, and the atmospheric burden of mercury has perhaps tripled since the industrial age. Whatever needs to be done to protect humanity from its love affair with quicksilver, it had better happen soon.

In August 1996 Karen Wetterhahn, a chemistry professor at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, spilled a few drops of a laboratory compound called dimethyl mercury onto one of her hands. She was wearing latex lab gloves, so she didn’t think much of it. A colleague saw her at a conference the following November. “She said she thought she was coming down with the flu,” says toxicologist Vas Aposhian of the University of Arizona. By the time Wetterhahn was diagnosed with mercury poisoning, in January, it was too late. Despite subsequent treatment that helped clear the metal from her body, she lapsed into a vegetative state in February and died the following June.

Scientists are at a loss to explain why mercury often takes months to exert its effects. “If we knew that, we’d know a lot more about how mercury poisons the brain,” says Tom Clarkson, a toxicologist at the University of Rochester Medical Center.

The degree of mercury’s toxicity depends on the form and route of exposure. You can swallow the liquid form of elemental mercury without much fear because it doesn’t easily penetrate the lining of the stomach and intestines. On the other hand, liquid mercury vaporizes at room temperature, and when you inhale the vapor it moves right from the lungs to the bloodstream to the brain. A broken thermometer can release enough mercury vapor to poison the air in a room—one reason why some cities and several states discourage the sale of mercury fever thermometers.

Mercury also binds with other elements in salts and organic compounds of varying toxicity. Dimethyl mercury, the substance that poisoned the Dartmouth chemist, is a synthetic form of organic mercury rarely found outside a lab. A simpler organic compound called methylmercury is of greater concern because methyl- mercury is the form found in the flesh of fish.

Seafood is one of the two most common sources of mercury exposure in adults. Although concentrations of mercury in air and water are increasing, they are still too small for alarm. But bacteria process the mercury in lakes and oceans into a form that accumulates in living tissue. Plankton take in the bacteria and are in turn eaten by small fish. With each meal, the mercury concentration rises. Then larger fish eat the small fish, increasing tissue concentrations still more. Fish at the top of the food chain accumulate the most mercury. The species singled out by the recent FDA advisory—big predators such as albacore tuna, shark, and swordfish—can have 100 times more mercury in their tissues than smaller fish do.

The methylmercury in fish passes readily from the human gut to the bloodstream and on into all organs and tissues. It seems to act most powerfully on the brain because the compound is strongly attracted to fatty molecules called lipids, and the brain has the highest lipid content of any organ. Methylmercury crosses the protective blood-brain barrier by binding with an essential amino acid that has dedicated carrier proteins for shunting it into brain cells. Once inside brain cells, some of it gets converted to an inorganic form that sticks to and disables many structural proteins and enzymes essential to cell function. “It can destroy the biological function of any protein it binds to,” says Boyd Haley, a biochemist at the University of Kentucky.

Researchers learned how much mercury the body can tolerate from studies of victims of catastrophic poisoning, such as the Japanese sickened by eating fish from Minamata Bay and the Iraqis who ate grain treated with a methylmercury-based preservative in the early 1970s. But those studies do not reveal how little mercury it takes to cause harm. At the time of her diagnosis, the Dartmouth chemist had 4,000 micrograms of mercury per liter in her blood. A diet consistently high in fish can create a blood-mercury level of about 25 micrograms per liter. That’s far below a lethal dose, but it still may not be safe.

Concerns about low-level toxicity haunt discussions of another ubiquitous source of mercury exposure: silver dental fillings. Elemental mercury, which makes up half of silver fillings, releases mercury vapor, just as liquid mercury does. The vapor from dental amalgams is the primary source of the one to eight micrograms of mercury per liter of blood, that is, according to some sources, in the average American adult. That amount uncomfortably overlaps the Environmental Protection Agency’s current safe level of 5.8 micrograms per liter. But the EPA’s safety level is based on methylmercury exposure, about which more is known. No human studies have assessed prolonged exposure to low levels of mercury vapor. One study hints at subtle neural and behavioral anomalies in dentists, who collectively use 300 metric tons of mercury in amalgams each year and who often have two to five times the typical concentration of mercury in their urine.

History

Mercury was known to the ancient Chinese and Hindus; the element has been found in Egyptian tombs from 1500 B.C.

Source

Mercury rarely occurs free in nature but can be found in ores, principally cinnabar. The element, which exists in its natural form as a mix of seven stable isotopes, is most often found near volcanoes or geothermal springs. The metal is obtained by heating cinnabar in an air current and condensing the vapor.

Uses

Mercury easily forms alloys, called amalgams, with other metals like gold, silver, and tin. The element has many uses in the chemical industry, such as in the manufacture of sodium hydroxide and chlorine by the electrolysis of brine, as well as in making advertising signs, mercury switches, and other electrical apparatuses. It is also used to make sensitive measuring devices for laboratories. Other uses are in dental work, batteries, and catalysts. Because of mercury’s toxicity, many of these uses are under review.

Silver-mercury fillings have never been tested for safety. “The amalgam question will never be solved until we do a clinical trial like those we do with other medical devices,” says Aposhian.

“It’s really unclear what’s going on with dental amalgams,” says Stern, who notes that the issue is complicated by the potential for panic and lawsuits. “It’s a snake pit.”

One of the lessons of Minamata is that mercury, like lead, is harder on fetuses than on the women carrying them, or adults in general. In the Japanese event, women with no overt symptoms of poisoning gave birth to severely disabled children. “It was evident there was a major difference in susceptibility between the developing brain and the mature brain,” says Philippe Grandjean, an epidemiologist at the Harvard University School of Public Health. “When we saw serious poisonings in Minamata, that made us wonder whether mercury could be like lead.”

Studies of lead have shown that IQ decreases approximately two or three points for every doubling of prenatal and early postnatal exposure. To see if mercury has comparable effects, Grandjean, along with Pál Weihe at the University of Southern Denmark, is conducting the largest study to date of children’s cognition and behavior in a population routinely exposed to low levels of mercury. His work in the Faeroe Islands of Denmark includes 1,000 mother-child pairs and spans almost 20 years. In a typical year, Faeroe islanders consume 1,000 pilot whales, or one whale for every 50 islanders. “They belong to one of the most fish-eating populations in the world,” says Grandjean.

Whale meat is one of the most highly contaminated seafoods because whales are at the top of the food chain. Even so, the mercury content of whale meat is considerably lower than that of the hypertoxic Minamata fish. An earlier study of shark eaters in New Zealand suggested that relatively high levels of mercury in a mother’s hair during pregnancy correlated with a loss of three IQ points in her child. High levels, in that study, were identified as six parts per million and above in the hair shaft.

Grandjean gave a battery of sophisticated cognitive and developmental tests to the Faeroese children when they were 7 and 14. His results indicate that IQ drops 1.5 points for every doubling in prenatal exposure to mercury. The 2000 National Research Council report concluded that the risk documented by Grandjean “is likely to be sufficient to result in an increase in the number of children who have to struggle to keep up in school.”

We learned there is a response at low levels,” says Grandjean. “It’s not a huge loss, but it’s certainly not negligible.”

Yet in another large, long-term epidemiological study conducted on the Seychelles Islands in the Indian Ocean, Clarkson has so far found no effect on neurological development from prenatal exposure to low levels of mercury in seafood. “We can’t exclude effects from 20 parts per million or even 12 parts per million,” he notes. But he concludes there is no graded risk that extends to the lowest exposure levels.

The 2000 research council report evaluated the Faeroe, Seychelles, and New Zealand studies and recommended that the EPA set safety standards based on Grandjean’s more sobering findings. The agency did. Then, for good measure, it added a 10-fold uncertainty factor—a safety margin to protect against scientific unknowns and individual differences in response to a toxin. The uncertainty factor lowers the threshold to a figure of 5.8 micrograms per liter of blood and 1.2 parts per million in hair.

The problem with safety factors is that they create a toxicological limbo between demonstrably harmful doses and levels that have been declared safe. Thus, when Centers for Disease Control surveys find that one in 12 American women of childbearing age—8 percent—have blood mercury levels above the safety threshold, the implications aren’t clear, either for them or for the children they bear. Epidemiologist Tom Sinks says, “It doesn’t tell us there’s a hazard.”

“The whole idea of a safety factor is to protect people,” Clarkson says. “You can’t turn it around to use as an indication of who’s at risk. If you’re just above it, you aren’t necessarily in trouble.”

That kind of hedging, along with disagreement among population studies, leaves regulators with plenty of wiggle room. The FDA, for example, uses a more relaxed safety standard for mercury based on studies from the 1970s and 1980s. Where the EPA safety level for daily exposure is 0.1 microgram per kilogram (about 2.2 pounds) of body weight, the FDA’s standard is about 0.4 microgram per kilogram per day. The difference is four times as much mercury.

Concern about early exposure to mercury doesn’t end at birth. Until recently, many infants received regular injections of mercury on a state-mandated, medically sanctioned schedule. The mercury came from a compound called thimerosal that has been used as a preservative in vaccines and other medicines since the 1930s. In 1999 the FDA recommended that thimerosal no longer be used in pediatric vaccines, and manufacturers have removed it from all but the influenza vaccine.

But some scientists and many more aggrieved parents are convinced that thimerosal in childhood vaccines has already caused, or at least catalyzed, the U.S. epidemic of autism.

An estimated 400,000 Americans today have autism, a once rare neurological disorder characterized by social withdrawal, difficulty communicating, and involuntary, repetitive movements. Although the exact numbers are in dispute, the rate of diagnosis seems to have climbed sharply in the last decade. In California the incidence of autism was six times higher in 2002 than in 1987.

During that period, federal health officials added four new kinds of vaccines to the childhood immunization schedule, and the amount of mercury routinely administered to infants in the first six months of life more than doubled. Throughout the 1990s, a 3-month-old baby might receive as much as 63 micrograms of mercury in a single visit to a doctor—roughly 100 times the daily EPA safety level. By the age of 6 months, properly immunized children were exposed to at least 188 micrograms of mercury in a series of at least nine injections. Although the 1999 FDA action minimized such exposure, some infant flu vaccines still contain 12.5 micrograms of mercury per dose—more than 10 times the daily EPA safety level for a 20-pound baby.

Circumstantial evidence also implicates mercury in autism. Some of the symptoms of autism and mercury poisoning are similar, and Haley has garnered evidence from hair samples that autistic children do not clear mercury from their bodies as efficiently as most kids do. They may have a genetic susceptibility that allows more mercury to accumulate in their tissues, he says. That could make them more vulnerable to mercury-laced vaccines and the continuous low-level exposure from their mothers’ dental fillings. “It is amazing to me that no one has taken the tissue of autistic children to see if there is excess mercury there,” Aposhian told a committee at the Institute of Medicine in Washington, D.C., last year. “That’s one thing that really has to be done.”

There are other sources of uncertainty. The form of mercury in thimerosal—an organic compound called ethyl mercury—is the least studied of all mercury’s incarnations. When scientists argue about its toxicity, they typically rely on data from methylmercury, which may not be an equivalent form of exposure. Experts even disagree about whether ethyl mercury can cross the blood-brain barrier. (It probably does.) “There are no good ways to measure ethyl mercury in tissue,” toxicologist Polly Sager of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases told the Institute of Medicine committee.

The Institute of Medicine concluded last May that no claim could be made for a causal link between mercury-laced vaccines and autism, but several independent researchers had complained that their access to federal vaccine databases, which could provide evidence of a link, had been repeatedly blocked. A few scientists, including Haley and neuropharmacologist Richard Deth of Northeastern University in Boston, continue to study possible mechanisms for the connection. Deth reported last year, for example, that in human nerve cells thimerosal blocks a chemical reaction called methylation that is critical to gene activity and that is also disabled by exposure to lead.

The report that first triggered worries about a connection between vaccines and autism was published in the British medical journal The Lancet in 1998. It described eight children whose behavioral problems surfaced within two weeks of receiving the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. The Lancet and most of the article’s coauthors ultimately disowned the study because its lead author had not divulged that he was also being paid to conduct research for parents seeking to sue vaccine manufacturers. Nonetheless, the number of parents in the United Kingdom willing to immunize their babies with the vaccine dropped from 90 percent in 1998 to less than 80 percent in 2004.

Health officials in the United States addressed suspicions about immunization by recommending that thimerosal be removed from pediatric vaccines. Thimerosal might yet prove harmless, they reasoned, but the threat to public health posed by a drop in immunization rates was not worth risking. The same balance of risks exists regarding the issue of mercury in fish. The current Federal Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report recommends at least two fish meals a week. Fish are high in omega-3 fatty acids, which have proven benefits in preventing heart disease, the number one killer in the United States. “We know mercury is a hazardous substance,” says the CDC’s Sinks. “We know that less is better than more. We know that fish and shellfish are the principal source of methylmercury. But we also know that fish and shellfish are pretty nutritious food: high in protein, high in vitamins. They contain healthy fats.”

But troubling evidence suggests that methylmercury in fish might cause heart disease. A seven-year study of more than 1,800 men in Finland showed that those who ate the most fish doubled their risk of heart attack compared with those whose diets had less fish. The same men showed the same increase in risk for death from coronary and cardiovascular disease. And Grandjean’s Faeroe Islands study found that prenatal exposure to mercury caused significant increases in blood pressure among 7-year-olds.

The most troubling aspect of this controversial heart-disease data is that deleterious effects occur at mercury-exposure levels equal to or lower than for any other toxicological outcome, including the subtle neurological symptoms in the Faeroe Islands study. In Grandjean’s most recent examination of 14-year-olds, he has found a doubling of certain neurotoxic effects at five parts per million in hair samples. In the Finnish study, the men with the doubled risk of heart attack had hair samples with only two parts per million of mercury. They were eating little more than an ounce of fish a day. Stern speculates that 10 percent of American men may already eat enough fish to raise their risk of heart attack.

“There’s this interaction between mercury and fish oils that makes it very complicated because they both come from the same place,” he says.

The National Research Council report noted that low levels of mercury contamination might also harm the immune and reproductive systems. And mercury is being investigated in relation to Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, attention deficit disorder, and multiple sclerosis. But many low-level developmental effects will be difficult to identify, Stern says, because the compromised organ or function still falls within the range of normal. The intelligence scores of the Faeroese children, for example, were not pathologically low; it took rigorous statistical analyses to prove they were simply lower than they would have been otherwise. Likewise heart disease, as the nation’s leading killer, has plenty of confounding variables. “You’re looking to pull a signal out of a lot of noise,” Stern says.

That signal might soon get a lot stronger. While mercury contamination is no longer a threat in most childhood vaccines, it is likely to get worse in fish. “Because of the beneficial effects of fish consumption, the long-term goal needs to be a reduction in the concentrations of [methylmercury] in fish rather than a replacement of fish in the diet by other foods,” said the council’s report.

That goal is nothing less than unrealistic.


MERCURY FILLINGS

Dental amalgams, known as silver fillings, are composed of roughly 50 percent mercury. Studies of people with mercury-containing dental fillings show a correlation between the number and size of the fillings and the amount of mercury excreted in their urine. The relationship suggests that the mercury is derived from mercury vapor released from the fillings. Some evidence shows that the level of mercury in the brain tissue of fetuses, newborns, and young children is also directly proportional to the number of surfaces of amalgam fillings the mother has.

Mercury was a naturally occurring element in Earth’s atmosphere long before coal-fired generators, medical-waste incinerators, and chlor-alkali plants put more there. Some mercury escapes into the air when volcanoes erupt and mountains erode. It stands to reason that mercury has been accumulating in the flesh of fish, shellfish, and marine mammals since humankind began eating them—which is most likely why humans have a protein called metallothione to help detoxify mercury and other heavy metals.

But human activities have caused the mercury content of the atmosphere to rise by 1.5 percent a year, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, and the problem is global. Roughly half of the mercury deposited on U.S. soils and streams comes across the Pacific from Asia. Last year a United Nations report found that the toxin can travel thousands of miles in the atmosphere to contaminate pristine and uninhabited areas, such as the Arctic. Still, the United States has so far balked at attempts by the United Nations Environment Programme to draw up a binding protocol to reduce mercury pollution worldwide.

In the 1990's the United States made considerable progress in curbing emissions from incinerators for medical and municipal waste. Yet the number of states issuing local fishing advisories went from 27 to 48 in the last decade. Due to heightened concern, advisories for mercury are increasing faster than for any other pollutant.

The EPA is in the final stages of formalizing a rule that would limit emissions from coal-fired utilities, which produce 42 percent of the nation’s domestic mercury pollution. The agency’s standing proposal has been for a 70 percent reduction in mercury emissions by 2018. But environmentalists argue that the Clean Air Act calls for a 90 percent reduction by 2008. In 1992 the Natural Resources Defense Council sued the EPA for not maintaining the act’s standards, and in 1994 the parties reached a settlement. Under the terms of the agreement, the agency is required to issue a cleanup rule this month.

Wednesday, October 05, 2005

MAALOX MOMENT? MAYBE NOT

Turn on the television or read the newspaper and you'll see examples of brainwashing. It's the latest health crisis partnered with the latest and greatest of cures. 'They' convince us that our ailments are diseases and desperately need cures. Cures that only 'they' can offer us.

The newest to irritate me is acid reflux. 'They' call it acid reflux disease, or GERD, gastro esophageal reflux disease.

Heartburn is not a disease! It is a condition. Antacids, over the counter as well as prescription, are not cures. They are antagonists to bring the condition full circle in order to keep you purchasing more antacids!

Advertising claims would lead you to believe that any OTC antacid, such as Tums, Rolaids, Maalox or Pepcid, is harmless enough. Little did you know that taking an antacid actually can make your stomach problems worse.

Think about this for a minute. Normally, by design, we ought to put food into our bodies and our bodies ought to use acids to breakdown these foods. But now...We take an antacid BEFORE we eat (like Prevacid or Pepsid). This stops the production of acids. We eat (usually more than we should according to the portion control people). Our food does not get properly broken down and digested and bubbles back up on us. Ouch and Ick! So we take a Rolaid. We fight acid reflux all day until it's time to eat again. Vicious circle!!

You may be surprised to learn that the Daily Health News Contributing Editor, Andrew Rubman, ND, describes stomach acid as a good thing.

Proper digestion takes place as a series of functions, all of which depend on the presence of adequate stomach acid while you are eating. When you take OTC antacids, or even worse, the "more effective" prescription variety, you're cutting down or even eliminating the acid you need at meal times. Without it, your stomach can't adequately break down food into its nutrient components. What's more, inadequate digestion of proteins encourages the liver to increase production of LDL cholesterol, the kind of cholesterol that does the most damageto your body.

An all-too-common result of taking OTC antacids on a regular daily basis is an increase in cholesterol, which is then often treated with yet another drug (a big surprise) to lower cholesterol levels. ('They' are devious!) Not a roller coaster ride I want to be on.

If you stop taking antacids as a favor to your liver, what do you do about your sour stomach? Prevent it in the first place. Make sure you have adequate acid in your stomach during mealtimes, when you need it, and less stomach acid when you don't need it. What we call excess stomach acid is what we should call inappropriate stomach acid.

To make sure your stomach has sufficient acid at mealtimes:

  • Stop grazing on snack food throughout the day. Snacking signals the stomach to pump acid rather than saving it for mealtimes.
  • Always chew your food thoroughly. Introducing saliva into the food as you chew will get the digestion process off to a good start.
  • Don't drink very much liquid while eating a meal. More than a few sips of fluid will dilute the acid in the stomach.
  • Try to limit fluids for 30 minutes before you eat and for an hour afterward. The general rule: One fluid ounce of water for every two ounces by weight of solid food.

To avoid acid over-production try a few changes in eating habits:

  • Don't overeat. Leave that extra little bit of room for dessert, and then skip it.
  • Eliminate refined sugars, such as desserts. Sugars tend to destabilize the stomach, decrease efficiency of digestion, cause fermentation of the foods thereby removing nutritional value and creating gas.
  • Avoid caffeine which stops starch digestion and can impair acid production with meals.
  • Avoid fried foods which create gastrointestinal inflammation and speed the aging process.
  • Don't eat within three hours of bedtime.

If you still suffer from a sour stomach between meals or when lying down, put something in it that will quiet it without triggering more acid production. A time-tested remedy, believe it or not, is sauerkraut. In Europe, you can even buy sauerkraut juice for just that purpose. Five or 10 minutes after eating sauerkraut, your stomach will relax and you'll feel great.

Sounds weird, but in fact, the enzymes released during the fermentation of the cabbage as it turns into sauerkraut actually help break down and neutralize the inflammatory components of a sour stomach. Similarly, a teaspoon of vinegar will also work.

Should sauerkraut and vinegar not be for you, sometimes a small glass of whole milk will work, not more than two ounces. Some herbal products soothe and normalize the stomach without suppressing acid production.

Some recommendations are:

Gentian, an herb that comes in tinctures, capsules andfluid extracts. Usually using eight to 10 drops in a little bit ofwater will do the job. Use this as needed rather than prophylactically.

Glyconda, a traditional herbal combination that includes turkey rhubarb root, cinnamon and goldenseal, is another old-fashioned remedy, one that grandmothers in Italy have been giving their families for years. Dissolve 10 to 20 drops in two ounces of warm tea or water, and drink before a meal.

Gastri-Gest, a combination of plant-derived enzymes taken as needed as an antacid substitute. Available from Priority One (800-443-2039, www.priorityonevitamins.com).


Compound Herbal Elixir, a botanical mixture that can be used as needed as a "tummy tonic." Available from Eclectic Institute (800-332-4372, www.eclecticherb.com).

Both of these products also are available at quality health-food stores.

When problems don't resolve, occasionally a more severe stomach problem causes between-meal acid production. This occurs when something in the stomach lining stimulates it in the same way that food does. Typically, the cause is a yeast organism or something similar. Often, the culprit is the same creature found in vaginal or oral thrush. You can avoid it by following the above steps to maintain adequate stomach acid levels during meals.

Caution: Anyone with gastritis that persists for more than 10 days or recurs more than once a month should be tested for the bacterium Helicobacter pylori. It also might be an ulcer, which would require special treatment. Having a gastric or duodenal ulcer is one of the few problems that call for prescription antacids to suppress stomach-acid production just while the lesion heals properly. If your problem does not respond to the natural remedies above within a few days, see your health-care provider to rule out a more serious condition.

When it comes to acid indigestion, don't let the cure be worse than the disease. Healthy eating habits and a strategy to work with the body's natural digestive function will go a long way in calming that grumbling pain.

Tuesday, October 04, 2005

Accidental Vioxx Deaths & Vioxx Class-Action Suits

“Accidental” Vioxx Deaths During Research Studies

October 14th, 2005
by Christy Patrick

Even though the number of Vioxx users that died during research studies was triple the number who died on placebos, researchers did not worry because many of the deaths were “accidental”.

Researcher Saw No Vioxx Warning Sign;
Merck Official Says Deaths Were From a Variety of Causes
The Associated Press ATLANTIC CITY - A lawyer for the Idaho postal worker who blames Vioxx for his September 2001 heart attack grilled a Merck & Co. researcher Wednesday about why the company did not alert doctors over deaths among certain Vioxx users five months earlier. In Vioxx’s second product-liability trial, attorney David Buchanan questioned researcher Dr. Alise Reicin about death rates of people in clinical studies meant to see if Vioxx could also be used to treat Alzheimer’s disease. While three times as many Vioxx users in those studies died than people taking placebos, or inactive pills, Reicin said some Vioxx users died from accidents, and rates of cardiovascular trouble were the same among the two groups. “We didn’t view it as a safety signal because the deaths were so different,” she testified. Buchanan represents Frederick Humeston, 60, who suffered a heart attack in his Boise home four years ago after taking Vioxx intermittently for two months to ease lingering knee pain. Merck, which in August was hit with a multimillion-dollar verdict when it lost a Vioxx trial in Texas, says Humeston’s job stress and health risks, not Vioxx, caused his heart attack. The company faces thousands more such lawsuits. Reicin said some Vioxx users in the Alzheimer’s studies died after they stopped taking the drug, while others died of pneumonia, car crashes and other accidents, according to Merck data. Full Story




Breakdown of Vioxx suits
September 4th, 2005 by Nancy Callahan

Here’s a breakdown of the Vioxx-related suits filed so far:

  • More than 5,000 product liability lawsuits, nearly all of them personal injury lawsuits, have been filed against Merck. They include:
  • 1,811 federal lawsuits consolidated for pretrial coordination to streamline steps common to the cases, such as document gathering and witness depositions.
  • More than 290 federal lawsuits pending but not yet consolidated with the others in what’s called multidistrict litigation
  • More than 250 cases pending in California state courts.
  • About 2,475 cases pending and coordinated under one judge in Atlantic County, New Jersey.
  • More than 200 cases pending in state courts elsewhere.

The above categories include 148 potential class-action cases, which could eventually include many plaintiffs if judges certify them as class actions. A handful of those cases involve union health plans, insurers and other third-party payers to seek reimbursement of money they paid for Vioxx for their prescription plan members. One such class action suit filed by a New Jersey union has been certified.

Free your mind, man!

Have you seen the TV commercial for Paxil? There is a woman running through a field of flowers and pills are falling from the sky. She is saying something about how Paxil gave her life back to her.

Sounds like the hippies of the 60's, eh? Free your mind, man!

Feels like the government stole our view of drugs, told us, "no, no, that's not good for you" and then applied what they stole to their drugs. They don't want to legalize street drugs because there is no money in it for them, but if they outlaw street drugs and produce 'pharmaceuticals' they can charge an arm and a leg, legally, by convincing us that we need them.

They didn't just want a cut, they wanted to own the market.

3 Dead Infants, 2 Hours of Insomnia = 1 Great Film Idea

This post has been hi-jacked from adisen, who is actively shattering the rose-colored glasses we see through, be sure to visit her.

3 Dead Infants

Reading the news from Ontario that three infants, all two months old, died in January from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) was so disturbing. It was my biggest fear when my children were infants. I just can’t imagine the grief those parents must be feeling. What makes this story newsworthy is the fact that the Coroner’s office that is investigating these deaths has found that all three infants had been vaccinated in the two weeks before their deaths. According to the story, no link has been made between the vaccines and the deaths, however. (big surprise!) 2 Hours of Insomnia As I was laying awake, pondering the fact that a ten-pound, two-month old infant who’s immune system is not even close to being fully developed, receives two (three in the US) vaccines that contain nine viruses and diseases, I wondered how any immune system could be expected to fight all those bugs without having some kind of negative reaction.In most Canadian provinces and U.S. states, the vaccine schedule is the same: at two, four and six months of age the baby is given two needles containing active ingredients that are meant to produce antibodies that will protect the infant from: diphtheria (a disease of the skin, nose and throat) pertussis (whooping cough) tetanus (lock jaw) polio HIB (haemophilus influenza type B) pneumonia influenza meningitis infections of the bloodstream and infections of the middle ear Hepatitis B For the vaccine to work, the body must react to the disease in some way, to create the desired antibodies that are supposed to provide immunity. That is a lot of work for a very small body that is still only partially developed in terms of its immune, digestive, neurological, sensory, (etc., etc.), systems! Admittedly, I’m not a doctor, but I know that I sure wouldn’t want to be fighting polio, pneumonia and meningitis at the same time. (Not to mention fighting the effects from and the elimination of the poisons used to preserve the viruses!) 1 New Film Idea So here’s the crazy idea. We should do a documentary film about the most high-profile vaccine supporters, from doctors to journalists, health policy-makers to vaccine manufacturers, military seniors to the executive directors of pro-vaccine charities. They all claim vaccines are, if not entirely safe, so safe that risk of an adverse vaccine reaction is one in a million (the most repeated stat around vaccinations that ever there was.) I would like to get them on record making their assertions of safety. And then, I’d like them to put their own immune systems where their mouths are: to sit down, roll up their sleeves and take the same vaccinations given to our infants – BUT – adjusted for their weight. So, a 150 pound doctor would receive 15 needles-full of each of the shots given to the two-month old. And then they’d get the same 15 needles again two and four months later. Kind of a Super-Size for vaccines. Anyone who wants to help out on this project is welcome to contact me. It will be a great film! We just need to find the funding, maybe an unrestricted educational grant from Merck? We should look into it…

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Woman Cures Herself of MS

What follows is the story of Nancy Delise, who, over the years, has utilized retail colloidal silver, colloidal silver made with a basic generator, basic colloidal silver enhanced with H2O2 (orally), and finally, IV Silver ( Argentyn 23 by Natural-Immunogenics - Available only to MD's ).

Her Condition: Multiple Sclerosis... This is her story written diary style.

Before silver I had been on Betaseron, since it came on the market; for 6 or 7 years. I would say it did as promised; I had no exacerbation since I began the injections. However, everyday I hated to get up to see what additional symptom I had to add to my list of things to get used to.

My right hand is numb, my feet, especially my toes are numb. When I get hot or tired my right leg does not lift well. It drags when I walk. After a day at work, I practically have to crawl to my car. I must hold on to a wall at all times. I cannot even go up a curb without holding on to someone or something. No way can I climb a ladder. When I sit for any length of time, my legs stiffen and get spasms and I have to wait awhile before I can walk. It appears that I have had too much to drink. I really should use a cane, but usually I can take my companion’s arm to get to my car.

If I sit on the floor for any reason, like to play with my grandchildren, I must first get on my knees, then on all four’s, then finally I can get up. Just like a cow. I cannot use help getting up from the floor, I need more control. I sit on the floor as little as possible.

When it is hot, I must wear a cold pack vest or I cannot walk. My feet are hot all the time, and I cannot sleep unless my feet are uncovered. I have night paralysis. I must throw my body in order to turn to another side. My legs are locked in the fetal position and it is a real chore to get them unlocked and able to walk. I must use a cane to get to the bathroom during the night. It is about ten feet from my bed. Jane Wyman has become my good friend (with the Poise pads). I cannot go out without the Ultra Poise pads. If I know I will be away from a bathroom for any length of time, I must use Depends. It goes without saying, I must use the pads at night, also.

Colloidal Silver: Oral Use

I began drinking 2 oz of Silver water twice a day, once in the morning & again at three pm.

Day four - I began to drink 8 oz of Silver water two times per day. I seem to have more energy and the end of the day seems to come a little later. I do not drag as much to my car.

Day 12 - The night paralyzation seems to be easing. I can get out of bed with more ease.

Days 14 thru 18 find my fingers and toes are tingling more and more. My toes are aching. As the days go by my fingertips seem to be aching also.

Day 20 - I seem to have surreal feelings in my fingers. It’s like a far away, out of body feeling. They still ache.

Day 21 - I am getting out of bed much easier and quicker. I climbed a ladder at work! I am not nearly so tired when I leave work. I can actually walk to my car without holding on to the wall. I did some things on the floor at work, and was able to get up without too much trouble.

Week 4 - The bottom of my feet are tingling, and I can feel whiskers on Mike’s face (a surreal feeling). I can feel cool bathroom tile on bottom of my feet. My legs ache all night. It is very painful and I want to scream out. My legs hurt a great deal. The next morning I was able to walk further than I had in years. Mike and I walked about four blocks that morning. I was feeling stronger and stronger every day.

Week 5 - Have more and more feeling in both fingers and toes every day. Less surreal and more natural. Both toes and finger get cold.

Week 10 - I seem to have small changes every day. Again, my toes ached for several days, then I had more feeling in my toes. It’s as though I have a non feeling pad at the bottom of my feet, but feeling all the way around. Like an animal’s paw with the padded bottom. It seems I hurt for a few days, then something feels better.

Week 12 - I feel like a caterpillar in a cocoon. I wonder if they have pain during the metamorphosis. The bottom of my feet are no longer numb, the fingers on my right hand tingle only at the very tips. I don’t even think twice about lifting a heavy container with my right hand. For years, I wouldn’t dare lift, or I would drop whatever I was holding. I poured hot coffee from a pot without even thinking about it, until I noticed myself. Doing it.

There is NO WAY I could be working the hours I have this Christmas, if not for the water. At this time last year, I had to wear my cooling vest all day every day, and when I went home I could barely walk to my car. Some days I literally dragged my right leg to get to my car. I had to hold on to the building to get around the corner and into my car. When I got home I actually crawled on my hands and knees to get up the steps.

This year I never once had to wear my cooling vest. I walk normally to my car at the end of the day, and the steps are not too much of a problem. I still go up one leg only, but it is stronger. The fatigue is minimized, also. I’ve worked many more hours this year than last.

Week 14 - I started making my own water about three weeks ago, and I’ve had to send samples to San Antonio for testing. It seems the probe they sent me was not working to full potential, and for about a week I was drinking water with very minimal amounts of silver.

After that week, I KNEW IT!!! I was regressing. Things were not working so well, again. Thankfully we figured out the problem and within a couple of days I was back on track. Thank God. This set back has convinced me even more, as if that were possible. I have my life back. I will never give up silver water.

Week 20 - Christmas Week: I had 16 people for dinner on Christmas eve. I had 7 people for dinner Christmas day, I worked 11 hours the day after Christmas, and I had 14 people for dinner the next day. That is four days out of four I entertained at my house. I can’t remember when I did something like that. I still have night paralysis, but not nearly as bad as it used to be, and I have a lot of stiffness still when I sit a long time, but nothing near as bad as it used to be. My energy level is very high.

August 2002, My MS Update: This is the second anniversary of my long, but wonderful, journey with colloidal silver (CS). I am a 59-year-old female who had relapsing remitting MS for 31 years. About 1995 it changed to secondary progressive MS. Thus began my long road of decline. Everyday I got worse. When I discovered CS, I could barely walk. I was beginning to use a cane. I could not even go up on the curb without aid. My prognosis was grim. I had some knowledge of the great properties of silver, so the idea of CS intrigued me. I researched CS. What did I have to loose?

I worked up to drinking 16 oz per day. In about three weeks I began to notice a difference. The above is a log of my first year’s progress. I seemed to reach a plateau about this time. I did not improve, BUT I never got worse.

I have since had an MRI and it showed that at this time Aug 2001, I no longer have MS. I have had no new lesions for well over a year. What I am working on at this time is to repair the damage. Since the damage is to the myelin and not the central nervous system, I am quite confident I can improve.

1 year-6 months - Hydrogen Peroxide Added:

I have researched adding hydrogen peroxide to the CS. One drop of H2O2 per 2 oz. of CS. I learned this would cause the tiny silver particles to break up into even more minute particles. After 15 minutes, the peroxide was evaporated out of the CS, so it is not harmful to the body, but the tinier particles of silver get into the blood stream quicker. All this time it was a slow process because by the time the silver got to the myelin where it was needed, it was so diluted, it couldn’t penetrate the lesions and kill the mycoplasma (MS virus).

Within a week I began to feel old symptoms again. This is what I call a healing crisis: I would get symptoms of the MS as the virus was dying and the dying pathogen aggravated the nerves, so for 2-4 days I would feel like I was having varying degrees of exacerbation. After a short period, it would end and I was improved again. If I had known about this earlier, I am convinced my recovery time would have increased a great deal.

1 year-9 months - I am sure there is a way to go even quicker ……… I began to research IV drips. There are cases of HIV-AIDS infected patients going into complete remission after three infusions. I worked on this project for about six weeks. I finally found someone with a protocol of infusing CS intravenously. I also found a doctor willing to work with me and give this a try.

1 year-11 months - First Colloidal Silver IV Administered:

I had my first IV and by that evening I had my first healing crisis; my legs became extremely heavy (like they were 2 years ago). My fingers tips were still numb, but the numbness was extremely exaggerated. All was better at day four.

Second CS IV a week later: My legs are again aching a great deal, the numbness in my fingers is very intense. It almost feels like they are not attached to me. All was better by day three.

Third, fourth, fifth IV: Each time I experienced a reverse of some symptoms I had either forgotten about over the last 40 years, or didn’t realize over the years were actually MS symptoms. I’ve practically no problems at all now. I feel better then I have in 15 years. I will have no more IV’s, but I will NEVER stop drinking CS. If I had known about the IV’s I probably would have had full recovery even sooner. I am quite sure the old lesions are going away. I am anxious for another MRI to prove this also.

TWO YEAR ANNIVERSARY: No more MS, no more symptoms. Most myelin repaired.

PS: My friend, also an MS patient is on the IV drip. She also no longer has MS (By her MRI), but she was more sore than I, and not able to get out of her wheel chair. Since the IV’s she has given up all her spasm medication and has begun to take STEPS ON HER OWN.

I would be happy to share what I've learned with anyone. Call me,
Nancy Delise @ 708-442-6229
http://testimonials.silvermedicine.org/content/ms-cured-argentyn.html